<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Latest Employment Law News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reasonable Adjustments &#8211; Employers should consider job swaps</title>
		<link>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/reasonable-adjustments-employers-job-swaps/</link>
		<comments>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/reasonable-adjustments-employers-job-swaps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws & Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
In the case of Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police v Jelic the Employment Appeals Tribunal supported an employment tribunal&#8217;s finding that a reasonable adjustment could involve swapping roles among employees.
The EAT did observe that the case they were considering involved a &#8220;disciplined service&#8221; &#8211; where the employee whose role would have been changed  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/reasonable-adjustments-employers-job-swaps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Keep As Far Away as Possible from The Law&#8221; &#8211; Employment Judge</title>
		<link>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/keep-away-from-law-employment-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/keep-away-from-law-employment-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws & Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nation&#8217;s foremost expert on employment law,  Lord Justice Mummery, a Court of Appeal Judge, has encouraged any new government to halt the &#8220;torrent&#8221; of legislation, while also observing that &#8220;the law is best kept as far away as possible; you&#8217;re best off having nothing to do with it&#8221;.
Small employers will be very aware of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/keep-away-from-law-employment-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious viewpoint not protected in Discrimination Law</title>
		<link>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/religious-viewpoint-protected-discrimination-law/</link>
		<comments>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/religious-viewpoint-protected-discrimination-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws & Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd,  a high profile discrimination case that reached the Court of Appeal recently, was unsuccessful in getting permission to appeal against a decision of the Employment Appeals Tribunal (the EAT).
The appeal was made by Gary McFarlane, who was employment as a relationship counsellor by Relate Avon Ltd. He was dismissed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/religious-viewpoint-protected-discrimination-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shoesmith Dismissal Ruled Lawful</title>
		<link>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/shoesmith-dismissal-ruled-lawful/</link>
		<comments>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/shoesmith-dismissal-ruled-lawful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sharon Shoesmith, former head of childern&#8217;s services at Haringey Council, has lost her latest case against her dismissal.
The result of a judicial review of her dismissal has concluded that the dismissal was lawful. Her lawyers had claimed she had been made a scapegoat after the death of &#8216;Baby P&#8217; &#8211;  Peter Connelly.
Ms Shoesmith&#8217;s lawyers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/shoesmith-dismissal-ruled-lawful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equality Act 2010 Clears Third Reading in House of Lords</title>
		<link>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/equality-act-2010-clears-reading-house-lords/</link>
		<comments>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/equality-act-2010-clears-reading-house-lords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws & Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality Bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Equality Bill had its third reading in the House of Lords today, and is now expected to be followed by approval of the Lord’s amendments in the House of Commons, and finally Royal Assent  - which will make the Bill an Act of Parliament.
The new Act will harmonise many of the current discrimination &#38; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://employmentlawclinic.com/news/equality-act-2010-clears-reading-house-lords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
