• Home
  • Our Services
  • Employment Tribunals
  • Employment Contracts
  • Disciplinary & Grievance
  • Attendance & Performance
  • Flexible Working
  • Latest News
  • Articles & Guides
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Employment Law Services
  • Employment Law Clinic
  • >
  • Contracts of Employment
  • >
  • Working Time Regulations Leave John Lewis with £40 Million Bill

John Lewis Admits not Paying Correct Holidays

The John Lewis Partnership has recently reviewed its holiday pay policy, and realised its partners (John Lewis parlance for employees: its 85,500 permanent staff are “Partners” who own the shops across the UK) have not been paid correctly under the Working Time Regulations .

 

The cost of the repayments to the John Lewis Partnership is estimated at around £40 million, an average of nearly £500 per partner.

 

From the limited information in the press release , it appears that the partners were not being paid the full equivalent rate to when they would have been working, premiums paid for working Sundays/bank holidays.

 

A principal objective of the Working Time Regulations is that workers are not worse off when taking their annual leave comparable to if they were working. By not paying the value of premiums during annual leave, staff would have lost out, and could have been discouraged to take leave as a consequence.

 

Calculating the pay for annual leave can be confusing, and if an employer the size of John Lewis has managed to get it wrong for seven years, so too could many small employers. It might not cost you £40 million, but if the statement of particulars  isn’t clear enough to allow workers to calculate leave entitlements properly, claims could be made in the employment tribunals for any deductions from leave, and for a failure to provide a statement of particulars complaint with section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

And with many employers still using terms such as “20 days plus bank holidays”, a policy that leads to incorrect advice even from some professionals in the HR industry on business forums (and which would also fall foul of requirements to ensure calculations on leave entitlements can be easily made) , the possibilities of exposing your business to a claim are significant.

 

It won’t cost you to find out how Employment Law Clinic can help, and we’ll even provide a free review of your employment contracts to advise whether they need attention – just fill in the form below, or email employment-contract-reviews@employmentlawclinic.com with a copy of your current terms and we’ll be in touch.

 

[qcf]

Filed under: Contracts of Employment, General News, Laws & Regulations by Employment Law Clinic           Post created on: August 24th, 2013

« “Employee Shareholders” Finally Approved
ACAS Early Conciliation a Prerequisite of Employment Tribunal Claims »
  • Employment Law News Latest Entries

    • Most Glaringly Obvious Judgment Ever? S38 Employment Act 2002 Is Clearly A Duck!
    • Complicating Employment Laws Even More
    • Overtime Worked should be counted in average pay for holiday pay
    • UK has better than average days paid annual leave in the G20… and the EU #GE2017 #UKemplaw #BankHolidays
    • TUPE ELI is limited to s.1 Statement of Particulars, not whether payments are contractual/non-contractual
  • Employment Law News Archives

  • Categories



Testimonials | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Copyright © 2008-2021 Employment Law Clinic Ltd • Kemp House • 160 City Road • London • EC1V 2NX • 020 3397 2979