• Home
  • Our Services
  • Employment Tribunals
  • Employment Contracts
  • Disciplinary & Grievance
  • Attendance & Performance
  • Flexible Working
  • Latest News
  • Articles & Guides
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Employment Law Services
  • Employment Law Clinic
  • >
  • Fitness for Work
  • >
  • EEF Survey Leads to Calls for Tax Breaks to Manage Sickness Absence

Manufacturing Employers Call for Help with Sick Leave

 

Manufacturers’ trade organisation, EEF, published its latest annual survey this week, with findings that long term absence is increasing for more than 40% of its members, with the NHS not helping to get staff back to work.

After previously concluding that the “fit note” procedure was not fit for purpose, this year’s survey evaluated the impact of the Fit for Work service.

 

Fit for Work service

The key findings from the survey were not encouraging for the Fit for Work service, only 20% of companies saying they were willing to pay for employee medical treatments recommended by the service. However, this figure did rise to 60% who would pay if the cost were to be offset against allowable business expenses.

Of 306 employers that responded to the survey, only seventeen (17) had used the Fit for Work service, referring employees for assessment.

And almost one fifth (18%) of those aware of the service (awareness of the service was 78% of respondents), reported that they did not intend to use it.

 

Fit Notes

Having concluded from previous annual surveys that the Fit Note procedure was not working, the most recent survey found that 45% of employers felt these are not helping their staff to return to work earlier, with most employers (47%) disagreeing with the advice given by GPs about their employee’s fitness to work, only 13% agreeing that GPs advise has improved.

 

Although still early days for the Fit for Work service, this is still a damning assessment of both this relatively new service (introduced in July 2015), and again the Fit Notes, the conclusions that GPs reach when completing these.

The full report is certainly a recommended read, and is available from the EEF website.

Filed under: Fitness for Work, General News, Health & Safety, Laws & Regulations by Employment Law Clinic           Post created on: June 14th, 2016

« A Minimum Living Wage
#Out – Where Does this leave Employment Law? #EUReferendum »
  • Employment Law News Latest Entries

    • Most Glaringly Obvious Judgment Ever? S38 Employment Act 2002 Is Clearly A Duck!
    • Complicating Employment Laws Even More
    • Overtime Worked should be counted in average pay for holiday pay
    • UK has better than average days paid annual leave in the G20… and the EU #GE2017 #UKemplaw #BankHolidays
    • TUPE ELI is limited to s.1 Statement of Particulars, not whether payments are contractual/non-contractual
  • Employment Law News Archives

  • Categories



Testimonials | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Copyright © 2008-2021 Employment Law Clinic Ltd • Kemp House • 160 City Road • London • EC1V 2NX • 020 3397 2979