• Home
  • Our Services
  • Employment Tribunals
  • Employment Contracts
  • Disciplinary & Grievance
  • Attendance & Performance
  • Flexible Working
  • Latest News
  • Articles & Guides
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Employment Law Services
  • Employment Law Clinic
  • >
  • Contracts of Employment
  • >
  • Opposition to Rights for Shares Increases in Lords

Lords Reject “Rights for Shares” by Increased Majority

With an majority that’s grown by 15 – from 54 on 20 March, to 69 votes on 22 April 2013 – the government have once again lost a crucial vote in the House of Lords, their new status of “Employee Shareholder” (or “employment rights for shares”) defeated for the second time in the upper chamber today.

The Growth and Infrastructure Bill will now return to the Commons for parliamentary ping-pong, where two new amendments have been tabled in support of the clause. Amendments tabled will reportedly provide written details of any proposed scheme, and a seven-day “cooling-off” period.

Given the broad range of opponents to the proposals, and the small majority of 38 secured in the last Commons vote, unless an amendment is introduced that actually addresses some of the concerns raised by peers, the government may now struggle to get this legislation introduced into law, a humbling u-turn looking more likely – or in practice, withdrawing the clause for now with a(n empty) promise to reintroduce the legislation in a future parliamentary session… following which it could be quietly (many, including 260 peers, say sensibly) forgotten.

Rights Surrendered/Compensating Benefits for Employee Shareholders

The status of “Employee Shareholder”, an idea first floated by the Chancellor at the Conservative Party Conference last year, would give employees shares of between £2,000 and £50,000 exempt from Capital Gains tax. In return, the employees would have to sacrifice their rights to redundancy pay, protection from unfair dismissal, the right to request flexible working, and increase the notice required to take maternity leave – but with the latest amendments, have seven days to reflect on their decision.

Filed under: Contracts of Employment, Flexible Working, General News, Laws & Regulations by Employment Law Clinic           Post created on: April 22nd, 2013

« ‘Employee Shareholders’ set for Parliamentary Ping-pong
“Employee Shareholders” Finally Approved »
  • Employment Law News Latest Entries

    • Most Glaringly Obvious Judgment Ever? S38 Employment Act 2002 Is Clearly A Duck!
    • Complicating Employment Laws Even More
    • Overtime Worked should be counted in average pay for holiday pay
    • UK has better than average days paid annual leave in the G20… and the EU #GE2017 #UKemplaw #BankHolidays
    • TUPE ELI is limited to s.1 Statement of Particulars, not whether payments are contractual/non-contractual
  • Employment Law News Archives

  • Categories



Testimonials | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Copyright © 2008-2021 Employment Law Clinic Ltd • Kemp House • 160 City Road • London • EC1V 2NX • 020 3397 2979